Skip to main content

Open Record archive

  1. The Bill for the War Comes Due at the Checkout Counter
  2. A State Spends Its Force Abroad and Its Patience at Home
  3. The Security State Turns Its Tools Inward
  4. The Iran War Keeps Exporting Its Costs
  5. Power Turns on Its Witnesses
  6. A Government That Performs Power
  7. Firing Squad Meant to Be Watched
  8. The War Is Now the Economy
  9. War Abroad Party at Home
  10. Guardrails Left a Map
  11. Who Decides Who Pays
  12. Pressure Campaign Reaches Brazil
  13. Record Caught Up
  14. Machinery Pointed Inward
  15. Bond Market Prices the Deficit
  16. Three Ways an Argument Disappears
  17. The Machinery Keeps Running
  18. The War Is Now a Domestic Story
  19. Who Counts Not Who Votes
  20. No to a Map Yes to a Database
  21. Power Was Visible Accountability Was Not
  22. Records Landed Claims Did Not Hold
  23. Projected Power Argument at Home
  24. Washington Is Rationing What the Public Sees
  25. Who Gets to See What Power Is Doing
  26. Power Moves in Days
  27. Four Institutions Four Judges
  28. The Loud Fight Ends
  29. The Bill Came Due
  30. Six Institutions Said No
  31. Saying Stop Is Not Stopping
  32. AI Slowdown Accountability Gap
  33. Cost Arriving Channel Narrowing
  34. The Question Is Who Pays
  35. Washington Offers a Check
  36. Dividend Promise Failing Election Machinery
  37. War Automated Faster Than Accounted For
  38. Nineteen Months
  39. The Election Is Now a Docket
  40. The Rule Is Not the Safeguard
  41. The Price Walked Into an Election
  42. Outrunning Review
  43. Machinery of Who Counts
  44. War's Real Bill Arrives Far From the Gulf
  45. The Legal Justification Comes Last
  46. A Price, Not a Front
  47. The Price of a War Nobody Calls a War
  48. War's Second Front Is Economic
  49. Three Instruments, One Method
  50. Fight Over the Machinery
  51. Documents Caught Up With Statements
  52. Capacity Without Checks
  53. The Machinery Is Not Failing
  54. Coercion Is the Policy
  55. You Cannot Sue a Bond Market
  56. War Washington Cannot End
  57. Blockade and Bond Market
  58. The Bill Comes Due
  59. Money Lost, Surveillance Won
  60. Government Stopped Showing Its Work
  61. Routed Around, Not Repealed
  62. Enforcement Turned Inward
  63. Past the Point It Can Hold
  64. What It Cost to Lose
  65. Who Holds the Veto
  66. Risk Moves Down
  67. The Government Rents Its Surveillance
  68. The Powers Expand, the Checks Sit Empty
  69. The Promise Was Only Worth the Pressure Behind It
  70. The Senate Traded Away Its Leverage
  71. Two Orders and a Shrinking Stockpile
  72. What Money Bought
  73. Money Lost Michigan, Won Missouri
  74. Change the Accounting
  75. Two Clocks
  76. Who Decides What Counts as a Threat
  77. The Claim Arrives First

Publication sections

The Open RecordInvestigationsCommentaryMethodAbout

Publication utilities

CorrectionsRSS 2.0

In the thread The 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement

The December Memo

Four months after Jeffrey Epstein died in federal custody, the Southern District of New York U.S. Attorney's Office delivered to Geoffrey Berman an 86-page memorandum on the investigation into potential co-conspirators. The Analysis section evaluated five subjects for criminal charges. Only two are visible in the indexed record.

Official portrait of Geoffrey S. Berman, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York.
Geoffrey S. Berman, then U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York, in his official portrait.Photo: U.S. Department of Justice, public domain, via Wikimedia Commons
Documents
3
documents
Citations
11
citations
People
3
people
Pages of record
185
pages of record
Reading time
7
minutes to read
Source discipline

11 primary, 0 corroborating, 0 tertiary. 11 citations in all.

  • T1 Primary
  • T2 Corroborating
  • T3 Tertiary
People in this piece
  • Jeffrey Edward Epstein, Principal, Deceased
  • Ghislaine Maxwell, Adjacent, Convicted
  • Lesley Groff, Enabler, Immunity recipient
Reading key
Miami HeraldSource 14reportingSarah KellenResearch Vault referenceEditorial essayargumentargument or opinion

The Memo

The document is dated December 19, 2019. It is titled "Investigation into Potential Co-Conspirators of Jeffrey Epstein." The cover page is marked PRIVILEGED — ATTORNEY WORK PRODUCT/DELIBERATIVE PROCESS and CONFIDENTIAL — SUBJECT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e). The addressee is Geoffrey S. Berman, U.S. Attorney. The authors are identified only as "AUSAs," their names redacted across every page of the indexed version EFTA02731082EE, EFTA02731082 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document.

The memo is 86 pages. It is the second federal prosecution memorandum prepared about Jeffrey Epstein and the people around him, and the first of the two that was delivered after he was dead.

What Preceded It

"On July 2, 2019, a federal grand jury in the Southern District of New York returned a sealed indictment (the 'Indictment') charging Jeffrey Epstein with one count of sex trafficking of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1591, and one count of conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371" EFTA02731082EE, EFTA02731082 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document. Epstein was arrested on July 6, 2019. The Indictment was unsealed on July 8, 2019. On or about August 10, 2019, he died in federal custody at the Metropolitan Correctional Center in Manhattan EFTA02731082, p1EE, EFTA02731082 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document.

Four months and nine days later, the memo was delivered to Berman.

The Named Subjects

The Background section of the memo names the subjects of the continued post-indictment investigation. "Since his death, we have continued the investigation that remained ongoing following the return of the Indictment against Epstein into potential co-conspirators. In particular, that investigation focused on Ghislaine Maxwell, [REDACTED], [REDACTED], and Leslie Groff" EFTA02731082, p1EE, EFTA02731082 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document. Two of the four are redacted at the identifier position. The two visible names are Maxwell and Groff.

Leslie Groff is the Leslie Groff of this investigation. The spelling variance is a documentary fact worth noting: the 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement spells her name "Lesley Groff" EFTA00192983, p20EE, EFTA00192983 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document. The 2019 SDNY memo spells it "Leslie Groff" across 19 indexed pages EFTA02731082EE, EFTA02731082 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document. The same person, the same immunity recipient, spelled two ways in two federal documents filed 12 years apart.

The Background section also notes that Maxwell's case would be handled separately. "The potential charges against Maxwell will be further analyzed in a separate prosecution memorandum, which is expected to seek authorization to charge Maxwell with federal offenses for her role in facilitating the transport of minors for illegal sex acts" EFTA02731082, p1EE, EFTA02731082 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document. That separate Maxwell memorandum is not EFTA02731082. It is referenced inside it.

The Analysis Section

The memo's Section IV is titled "Analysis." Its purpose, stated at the top: "In light of the evidence gathered during our investigation, as well as the [legal] tools available, in this section, we evaluate whether there is sufficient evidence to charge Leslie Groff and/or Ghislaine Maxwell with a federal crime and, if so, whether such charges would be in the interests of justice" [EFTA02731082, pp. 74-75].

Section IV has five lettered subsections in the indexed record: A, B, C, D, E. Sections A, B, and C name their subjects at the subsection header, and each of those three subject names is redacted in the indexed version. The two subsections whose subjects are visible:

The substantive analysis underneath each lettered subsection is itself heavily redacted across pages 75 through 85. The redaction analysis against the indexed version recovers place names (New York, Palm Beach, Virgin Islands), the names Epstein and Maxwell as document subjects, and one reference to Prince Andrew on page 59; it does not recover the subsection-A, -B, or -C subject names on pages 75 through 84.

The Gap With the 2007 NPA

The 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement granted federal immunity to Epstein and to "any potential co-conspirators of Epstein, including but not limited to Sarah Kellen, Adriana Ross, Lesley Groff, or Nadia Marcinkova" EFTA00192983, p20EE, EFTA00192983 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document. Four people named, plus an open-ended category.

The 2019 SDNY memo analyzes five subjects under Section IV. Only one of the four NPA-named recipients appears by visible name in that analysis: Leslie Groff, at subsection D. Kellen and Marcinkova do not appear by name in the indexed body of the memo at any page. The first name "Adriana" does not appear in the indexed body of the memo; the surname "Ross" appears on two pages, and whether either reference is to Adriana Ross is not established by the surrounding context. Whether any of the three NPA-named recipients other than Groff are the redacted subject of subsection A, B, or C is a question the indexed record does not answer. The redaction recovery against pages 75 through 84 has not surfaced the subject names.

Ghislaine Maxwell, at subsection E, was not named in the 2007 NPA's immunity clause. Her potential charges were sent to a separate prosecution memorandum, which did produce charges; she was indicted by SDNY in July 2020 and convicted at trial in December 2021.

What the Record Does Not Show

The names of the authors of the memo. The identities of the redacted subjects of subsections A, B, and C. Whether any of those three are Sarah Kellen, Nadia Marcinkova, or Adriana Ross. Whether the SDFL's 2007 NPA-era immunity travel with them across jurisdictions, and whether SDNY concluded it did or did not. Whether any of the three were ever charged. The separate prosecution memorandum on Maxwell referenced inside EFTA02731082 and not yet indexed under its own EFTA identifier. The substantive paragraphs of Section IV, which are redacted across pages 75 through 84.

Several Items Remain Open

The separate Maxwell prosecution memorandum referenced inside EFTA02731082. The redaction-recovery work on Section IV pages 75 through 84, to the extent the indexed corpus can surface the three redacted subject names at the subsection-A, -B, and -C headers. A clean cross-reference between the SDNY memo's Section IV subjects and the NPA's four named immunity recipients, once the redactions are recovered. The list of the AUSAs who authored the memo, which the Office has retained even where the indexed release redacts it. The 82-page SDFL prosecution memorandum (spring 2007), which is the document this memo's structure mirrors from the other side of the NPA. Those are the Phase 2 targets the Immunity Shield investigation now turns toward.

Documentary artifact

The 2007 and 2019 cross-reference, interactive

4 NPA names, 5 SDNY subsections.

Who the 2007 NPA named, and who the 2019 SDNY memo analyzed

The only overlap visible in the indexed record is Leslie Groff, at Section IV.D. Open any row to see what the corpus establishes.

The 2007 NPA immunity clause

Named recipients, EFTA00192983, p20.

Named in the NPA immunity clause at p. 20. Not visible in the indexed body of EFTA02731082. The first name “Sarah” and surname “Kellen” return zero page hits against the indexed memo. Whether she is the subject of SDNY Section IV subsection A, B, or C is not established by the indexed record.

Source.EFTA00192983, p20, at justice.govEE, EFTA00192983 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document

Named in the NPA immunity clause at p. 20. The surname “Marcinkova” returns zero page hits against the indexed SDNY memo. Whether she is the subject of Section IV subsection A, B, or C is not established by the indexed record.

Source.EFTA00192983, p20, at justice.govEE, EFTA00192983 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document

Named in the NPA immunity clause (spelled “Lesley”). Named on 19 pages of the SDNY memo (spelled “Leslie”), and she is the subject of Section IV subsection D. The only 2007 NPA-named recipient whose name is visible at a Section IV subsection header in the indexed 2019 memo.

Source.EFTA00192983, p20, at justice.govEE, EFTA00192983 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document

Named in the NPA immunity clause at p. 20. The first name “Adriana” returns zero hits in the SDNY memo. The surname “Ross” returns 2 page hits, but the surrounding context does not establish the references as Adriana Ross. Whether she is the subject of Section IV subsection A, B, or C is not established by the indexed record.

Source.EFTA00192983, p20, at justice.govEE, EFTA00192983 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document

The 2019 SDNY memo, Section IV analysis

Lettered subjects, EFTA02731082, pp74–85.

Subject name redacted at the subsection header. The substantive analysis is redacted across 7 pages. The redaction recovery against EFTA02731082 has not surfaced the subject name on these pages. The subject is one of the five individuals whose potential charges were evaluated in the December 2019 memorandum.

Source.EFTA02731082, at justice.govEE, EFTA02731082 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document

Subject name redacted at the subsection header. The substantive analysis spans pages 83 through 84. The redaction recovery has not surfaced the subject name.

Source.EFTA02731082, at justice.govEE, EFTA02731082 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document

Subsection C is referenced by the memo structure (A, B, C, D, E) but the C header is not visible in the indexed page cuts available to the corpus at time of publication. Substantive analysis presumed to run between subsections B (p. 84) and D (p. 85).

Source.EFTA02731082, at justice.govEE, EFTA02731082 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document

Subject name visible at the subsection header. Leslie Groff is named 19 times across the indexed memo. She is the same person named in the NPA immunity clause as “Lesley Groff” in 2007. The SDNY memo evaluates whether there is sufficient evidence to charge her with a federal crime “and, if so, whether such charges would be in the interests of justice” (pp. 74–75).

Source.EFTA02731082, at justice.govEE, EFTA02731082 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document

Subject name visible at the subsection header. The memo states that Maxwell’s potential charges “will be further analyzed in a separate prosecution memorandum” (p. 1). Not named in the 2007 NPA immunity clause. Indicted by SDNY in 2020 and convicted at trial in December 2021.

Source.EFTA02731082, at justice.govEE, EFTA02731082 on Epstein Exposed, an alternative host for the same document