EFTA00185206
legal memorandum
Relevance: unknown
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
EFTA00185206
Document Summary
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| EFTA Number | EFTA00185206 |
| Type | legal memorandum |
| Original Date | 2009-05-29 |
| Page Count | 310 |
| Pages Referenced | EFTA00185206--EFTA00185515 |
| Source Dataset | DOJ EFTA Release |
| Source Citation | Case 9:09-cv-80656-KAM, Document 21, FLSD Docket 2009-05-29 |
| Relevance | unknown |
| Status | indexed |
Content Summary
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, VS. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Defendant. JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-MARRA/JOHNSON Plaintiff, vs. JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Key Excerpts
"that require the imposition of a stay of the civil proceedings in the" (p. 4, quote)
"The decision whether or not to stay civil litigation in deference to parallel criminal proceedings is discretionary.... A movant must carry a heavy burden to succeed in such an endeavor." (p. 5, quote)
"merely the loss of the defendant's most `effective defense." (p. 6, quote)
"Trustee must still cant' the burden of proving all of the elements of his complaint for fraudulent transfers ... includ[ing] fraudulent intent, insolvency, and financial condition at the time of the transfers to the Defendants." (p. 7, quote)
Entities Mentioned
Persons
- Bradley Edwards -- victims' attorney
- Jacqueline Perczek -- attorney for intervenors
- Jeffrey Epstein -- defendant/subject
Organizations/Agencies
- Eleventh Circuit -- appellate court
Redaction Notes
OCR quality varies across pages. Check for redacted content:
ep redacted "EFTA00185206". For documents over 50 pages, significant content may be in attached exhibits rather than the primary filing.
Assessment
Large filing (310 pages) -- likely includes exhibits and attachments. Primary document content concentrated in first 20-40 pages; remainder is supporting documentation.
Document type: legal memorandum -- Legal argument supporting or opposing a motion.
Reliability: Tier 1 (Verified) -- Authenticated federal court filing with case number and docket entry.
Action needed: Manual review to assess relevance to active investigations, extract specific findings, and assign relevance rating.
Cross-References
Related filings in CVRA lawsuit:
ep search "EFTA00185206"Search by document number:
ep search "Document 21"
---
Enriched 2026-03-01 -- NPA Document Migration
that require the imposition of a stay of the civil proceedings in the
The decision whether or not to stay civil litigation in deference to parallel criminal proceedings is discretionary.... A movant must carry a heavy burden to succeed in such an endeavor.
merely the loss of the defendant's most `effective defense.
Trustee must still cant' the burden of proving all of the elements of his complaint for fraudulent transfers ... includ[ing] fraudulent intent, insolvency, and financial condition at the time of the transfers to the Defendants.