EFTA00081116
affidavit (Bradley Edwards)
Relevance: unknown
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE No. 1 and JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I represent Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 (as referred to as "the victims") in the above-listed action to enforce their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA). I also represented them (and several other victims) in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I am also familiar with the criminal justice system, having served as state prosecutor in the Broward County State Attorney's Office. 2.
EFTA00081116 -- UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS I. I,
Document Summary
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| EFTA Number | EFTA00081116 |
| Type | affidavit (Bradley Edwards) |
| Original Date | 2013-08-16 |
| Page Count | 64 |
| Pages Referenced | EFTA00081116--EFTA00081179 |
| Source Dataset | DOJ EFTA Release |
| Source Citation | Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM, Document 225-1, FLSD Docket 2013-08-16 |
| Relevance | unknown |
| Status | indexed |
Content Summary
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra/Johnson JANE DOE No. 1 and JANE DOE No. 2 v. UNITED STATES AFFIDAVIT OF BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, ESQ. REGARDING NEED FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS I. I, Bradley J. Edwards, Esq., do hereby declare that I am a member in good standing of the Bar of the State of Florida. Along with co-counsel, I represent Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2 (as referred to as "the victims") in the above-listed action to enforce their rights under the Crime Victims Rights Act (CVRA). I also represented them (and several other victims) in civil suits against Jeffrey Epstein for sexually abusing them. I am also familiar with the criminal justice system, having served as state prosecutor in the Broward County State Attorney's Office. 2.
Key Excerpts
"hav[e] a complete record, and this is going to be an issue that's ... going to go to the Eleventh Circuit, [so it] may be better to have a complete record as to what your position is and the government's is as to what actions were taken." (p. 1, quote)
"So I'll let both of you confer about whether there is a need for any additional evidence to be presented." (p. 1, quote)
"After consideration, the Government believes that an evidentiary hearing is not necessary" (p. 2, quote)
"We don't have any problem with agreeing that a factual assertion is correct if we agree that is what occurred" (p. 3, quote)
"case. 3 EFTA00081118 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 4 of 64 15. After further discussions failed to produce any agreement or other visible progress, the victims informed the U.S. Attorney's Office that they would file their" (p. 3, quote)
Entities Mentioned
Persons
- Alan Dershowitz -- defense counsel/intervenor
- Bradley Edwards -- victims' attorney
- Bruce Reinhart -- former AUSA/intervenor
- Jeffrey Epstein -- defendant/subject
Organizations/Agencies
- Department of Justice -- Department of Justice
- Eleventh Circuit -- appellate court
- FBI -- investigating agency
- Southern District of Florida -- federal jurisdiction
- State Attorney -- state prosecution
Redaction Notes
OCR quality varies across pages. Check for redacted content:
ep redacted "EFTA00081116". For documents over 50 pages, significant content may be in attached exhibits rather than the primary filing.
Assessment
Substantial filing (64 pages) with detailed argumentation or attached exhibits.
Document type: affidavit (Bradley Edwards) -- Sworn statement by victims' attorney Bradley Edwards.
Case context: Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 v. United States (CVRA enforcement action)
Reliability: Tier 1 (Verified) -- Authenticated federal court filing with case number and docket entry.
Action needed: Manual review to assess relevance to active investigations, extract specific findings, and assign relevance rating.
Cross-References
Related filings in CVRA lawsuit:
ep search "EFTA00081116"Search by document number:
ep search "Document 225-1"
---
Enriched 2026-03-01 -- NPA Document Migration
hav[e] a complete record, and this is going to be an issue that's ... going to go to the Eleventh Circuit, [so it] may be better to have a complete record as to what your position is and the government's is as to what actions were taken.
So I'll let both of you confer about whether there is a need for any additional evidence to be presented.
After consideration, the Government believes that an evidentiary hearing is not necessary
We don't have any problem with agreeing that a factual assertion is correct if we agree that is what occurred
case. 3 EFTA00081118 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 225-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/16/2013 Page 4 of 64 15. After further discussions failed to produce any agreement or other visible progress, the victims informed the U.S. Attorney's Office that they would file their