EFTA00184224
legal memorandum
Relevance: unknown
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rule 56.1, move for summary judgment on the issue of the United States Government's violation of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), where no genuine issue of material fact exists.
EFTA00184224 -- UNITED STATES, JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS AND M
Document Summary
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| EFTA Number | EFTA00184224 |
| Type | legal memorandum |
| Original Date | 2016-02-10 |
| Page Count | 982 |
| Pages Referenced | EFTA00184224--EFTA00185205 |
| Source Dataset | DOJ EFTA Release |
| Source Citation | Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM, Document 361, FLSD Docket 2016-02-10 |
| Relevance | unknown |
| Status | indexed |
Content Summary
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 9:08-ev-80736-ICAM JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2, Petitioners, UNITED STATES, Respondent. JANE DOE 1 AND JANE DOE 2'S CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS AND MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT WITH INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Local Rule 56.1, move for summary judgment on the issue of the United States Government's violation of their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA), where no genuine issue of material fact exists.
Key Excerpts
"victims, and their families, were ignored, cast aside, and treated as non-participants in a critical event in their lives. They were kept in the dark by prosecutors too busy to care enough .. . and by a court system that simply did not have place for them." (p. 1, quote)
"so that it could enter into a plea arrangement designed to prevent the victims from raising any objection. In doing so, the Government refused to afford victims the rights they had been promised by Congress—particularly" (p. 2, quote)
"the reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case," (p. 2, quote)
"the right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy." (p. 2, quote)
") specifically identified several dozen girls whom it classified as" (p. 2, quote)
Entities Mentioned
Persons
- Jack Goldberger -- defense counsel, Epstein
- Jeffrey Epstein -- defendant/subject
Organizations/Agencies
- FBI -- investigating agency
- Palm Beach Police -- initial investigating agency
- Southern District of Florida -- federal jurisdiction
- State Attorney -- state prosecution
Redaction Notes
OCR quality varies across pages. Check for redacted content:
ep redacted "EFTA00184224". For documents over 50 pages, significant content may be in attached exhibits rather than the primary filing.
Assessment
Large filing (982 pages) -- likely includes exhibits and attachments. Primary document content concentrated in first 20-40 pages; remainder is supporting documentation.
Document type: legal memorandum -- Legal argument supporting or opposing a motion.
Case context: Doe v. United States, Case No. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA (CVRA lawsuit)
Reliability: Tier 1 (Verified) -- Authenticated federal court filing with case number and docket entry.
Action needed: Manual review to assess relevance to active investigations, extract specific findings, and assign relevance rating.
Cross-References
Related filings in CVRA lawsuit:
ep search "EFTA00184224"Search by document number:
ep search "Document 361"
---
Enriched 2026-03-01 -- NPA Document Migration
victims, and their families, were ignored, cast aside, and treated as non-participants in a critical event in their lives. They were kept in the dark by prosecutors too busy to care enough .. . and by a court system that simply did not have place for them.
so that it could enter into a plea arrangement designed to prevent the victims from raising any objection. In doing so, the Government refused to afford victims the rights they had been promised by Congress—particularly
the reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government in the case,
the right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the victim's dignity and privacy.
) specifically identified several dozen girls whom it classified as